L'Indépendance énergétique

ពត៌មានពីមាតុភូមិ

តើដល់ពេលណាទើបខ្មែរឯករាជផ្នែកថាមពល

ជាពិសេសថាមពលអគ្គីសនី?

ខេមរជាតិ

ជាអាទិ នៅផ្នែកខាងកើត រហូតមកទល់ភ្នំពេញ ខ្មែរយើងទិញអគ្គីសនីពីយួន ។​ ចំណែកខាងលិច រួមទាំងខែត្រសៀមរាបរហូតមកដល់ពោធិសាត់ យើងទិញអគ្គីសនីពីសៀម ។ ខ្មែរយើងទិញអគ្គីសនីពីគេថ្លៃបីដងលើសពីដំឡៃនៃអ្នកជិតខាង កត្តាមួយញ៉ាំងឲ្យដំឡៃឥវ៉ាន់ទាំង ឡាយថ្លៃលើសពីដំឡៃដែលផលិតនៅប្រទេសជិតខាងយើង ដែលជាហេតុមួយមិនអាចអនុញ្ញាតឲ្យយើងប្រណាំងប្រជែងដណ្តើមទីផ្សារជាមួយគេបានឡើយ ។ ព្រោះហេតុដូច្នេះហើយបានជាយើងចាំបាច់ត្រូវនាំឥវ៉ាន់បរទេសចូល ជាជាងផលិតខ្លួនយើង។ ដូច្នេះ កូនខ្មែរត្រូវវេចបង្វេចទៅស៊ីឈ្នួលគេនៅប្រទេសគេ ជាពិសេសគឺប្រទេសជិតខាងយើង។ ជាកត្តាមួយដែលយើងជួយជំ រុញសេដ្ឋកិច្ចប្រទេសជិតខាងទាំងនេះឲ្យកាន់តែរីកចំរើនថែមទៀត។ ជាហេតុមួយដែលបណ្តាលឲ្យខ្មែរយើងគ្មានការធ្វើ ហើយគេបែរជានាំគ្នាត្មះតេះដៀលខ្មែរយើងថាខ្មែរខ្ជិលច្រអូសមិនចេះធ្វើការពុំនោះសោតធ្វើការមិនគ្រប់គ្រា ន់ទៅវិញ!

យើងសូមលើកអត្ថបទខាងក្រោមមួយមកជូន ។​ អត្ថបទនេះសរឲ្យឃើញថា តើយួនមកប្លន់យកសម្បត្តិថាមពលអគ្គីសនីយើងដូចម្តេចខ្លះ!!!

និយាយរួម ភាពទន់ខ្សោយរបស់យើង ជាពិសេសគឺភាពខ្ញុំគេដែលខ្មែរយើងកំពង់រស់នៅ សព្វថ្ងៃបណ្តាលមកតែពីកត្តាវិជ្ជមានតែមួយគត់គឺភាពអវិជ្ជា។ មិនមែនការហារមាត់ដេកចាំ តែ អំណោយឬការរត់តត្រុកទៅតាមសុំទានជំនួយគេពីពួកប្រទេសមហាអំណាចឈ្មោះថាយើងចេញផុតពីទាសភាពដូចសព្វថ្ងៃនោះទេ។ ពោលគឺយើងគប្បីត្រូវបណ្តាក់វិនិយោគទុនឲ្យបាន ច្រើនជាអតិបរិមាទៅក្នុងវិស័យសិក្សាធិការជាតិ ក្នុងវិស័យសិក្សាធិការភាសាជាតិ ភាសាកំណើ តដែលជាភាសាមត៌កដូនតាយើង នៅតាមគ្រប់មហាវិទ្យាល័យនិងសកលវិទ្យាល័យ ជាពិសេស នៅតាមផ្នែកវិទ្យាសាស្រ្តនិងបច្ចេកទេស។ នៅលើបញ្ហានេះ ជនរួមជាតិយើងនៅបរទេសត្រូវមាន តួនាទីទទួលខុសត្រូវមួយផ្នែកធំ។ ជាអាទិ វប្បធម៌មួយមិនអាចមានអនាគតទៅបានឡើយ ដរាបណាគ្មានការទ្រទ្រង់និងការចូលរួមពីអក្សរនិងភាសាកំណើតរបស់ខ្លួន។តើសព្វថ្ងៃនេះនៅ ទី ក្រុងភ្នំពេញយើង អក្សរនិងភាសាខ្មែរមិនមែនកំពុងតែអន់ថយពុំនោះសោតរលប់បាត់បន្តិច

ម្តងៗ ពីទស្សនីយភាពដែលជាសោភ័ណភាពនិងសំរស់របស់ទីក្រុងយើងទេឬ?

ជាការសំខាន់ណាស់ដែលខ្មែរយើងត្រូវរកចំឡើយទៅនឹងសំនួរដូចតទៅ ៖

១/. តើអ្នកណាដែលជាម្ចាស់ទុនចាក់វិនិយោគដ៏សន្ឋឹកសន្ឋាប់មកសង់សំណង់ខ្សែអគ្គីសនីយកភ្លើងពីយួនមកលក់រហូតដល់ភ្នំពេញ?

២/. តើអ្នកណាដែលជាម្ចាស់ទុនចាក់វិនិយោគមកសង់សំណង់ខ្សែអគ្គីសនីនាំយកភ្លើងពីសៀមមកលក់ដល់សៀមរាបនិងពោធិសាត់?

Quand le Cambodge aura son indépendance en énergie, en particulier en énergie électrique ?

Déjà l'Est du Cambodge, y compris Phnom Penh utilise l'électricité vietnamienne et l'Ouest y compris Siem Reap l'électricité thaïe. Les Cambodgiens paient trois fois le prix chez nos voisins. Ainsi nous contribuons à enrichir nos voisins et en plus ce qui rend nos produits plus chers que chez nos voisins, donc moins compétitifs. Ce qui fait que nous importons énormément de produits venants de nos voisins ! C'est une autre contribution pour enrichir nos voisins. Après on dit que les Cambodgiens ne travaillent pas assez ! Nous diffusons ci-dessous un article qui montre que le Vietnam vient piller notre richesse en énergie électrique !

Notre infériorité fondamentale réside dans notre ignorance. Ce n'est pas courir après les aumônes des grandes puissances que nous pouvons sortir de notre dépendance ! C'est investir massivement dans l'enseignement dans la langue de nos ancêtres, la langue du peuple, et plus particulièrement dans toutes les universités plus particulièrement scientifiques et techniques. Sur cette question nos compatriotes à l'étranger ont une responsabilité particulière. Une culture sans le support de la langue matérialisée par son écriture. Déjà à Phnom Penh, il y a de moins en moins d'écrits en caractères cambodgiens !

Il est aussi important de répondre aux questions suivantes :

Qui finance et qui construit les lignes à haute tension en provenance du Vietnam jusqu'à Phnom Penh ?

Qui finance et qui construit les lignes à haute tension en provenance de la Thaïlande jusqu'à Siem Reap ?

Phnom Penh Post

Electricity for Vietnam

Wednesday, 01 June 2011 15:03

Adam Miller and Phak Seangly

An official from the Ministry of Environment admitted yesterday that electricity generated from the controversial Lower Sesan 2 Dam, a project touted as ensuring cheaper energy prices in Cambodia, would be exported to Vietnam.

The admission, made at an NGO-led workshop held with indigenous community representatives in Phnom Penh, came after a United States-based fisheries expert and consultant for conservation group International Rivers estimated that only about 1 percent of the dam’s capacity would be used locally, with the rest being sold to Cambodia’s eastern neighbour.

The proposed US$816 million, 400-megawatt dam is set to begin construction later this year in Stung Treng province by the Cambodia-Vietnam Hydropower Company, a joint venture that is 51-percent owned by the EVNI Joint Stock Company of Vietnam and 49-percent owned by local conglomerate the Royal Group.

Prach Sun, a secretary of state for the Ministry of Environment, initially said yesterday that the potential of the Lower Sesan 2 Dam to fulfill local energy needs outweighed the environmental and social damage it may inflict on indigenous communities.

“The development of the Lower Sesan 2 Dam will have some effects on natural resources, but electricity is the most important resource for the country and we must ensure the development of hydroelectric dams will be achieved,” he said at the event, which was attended by over 60 villager representatives from Rattanakiri and Stung Treng who say they will be affected by the project.

“The relocation of people and the price of electricity decreasing will contribute to the development of the country,” Prach Sun said.

Danh Serey, deputy director of the Environment Impact Assessment department at the Ministry of Environment, echoed these comments, stressing the need for increased energy supplies in Cambodia.

“Cambodia needs electricity, we need to develop electric areas, and hydropower is much better than other sources – this is why the Lower Sesan 2 Dam is so important,” he said.

Yet the forum took an unexpected turn when fisheries expert and NGO consultant Ian Baird said that there was no evidence to support the claims that the electricity generated would be used in Cambodia.
“The plan of the company is to export all of this electricity to Vietnam,” he said.

“So I don’t know why we are talking about this [electricity] as being used in Cambodia,” he said, adding that Cambodia will be unable to even make use of the 400MW of power from the project without a national electrical grid. “This is not about electricity for Cambodia. It is not about reducing the cost of electricity in Cambodia,” Baird said. “They are trying to maximise their profit. It’s not for the benefit of the country – these are private companies.”

The comments prompted one representative from the Ministry of Environment to quickly change his stance.

Danh Serey later claimed that exporting the electricity to Vietnam was the second step of the process, after the energy needs of local communities in northeast Cambodia had been met.

“The Ministry of Environment has observed the situation closely. Only the left-over electricity from the use of local people will be sold to Vietnam,” he said following the event.

Baird said only a miniscule amount of the energy generated would be used locally.

“Maybe a very small amount of electricity they might use around Stung Treng, but it would be less than 1 percent,” he said, adding that the province could likely all be powered off of only 1MW of energy.

“It’s obvious the power is not for Cambodia because there is too much and there is no way to distribute it,” he said.

“The question is, what benefit is Cambodia getting? What is the Cambodian government getting in terms of taxes or concession fees?” he continued.

Royal Group Chairman Kith Meng declined to comment, referring questions to the Ministry of Industry, Mines and Energy. Royal Group chief financial officer Mark Hanna could not be reached for comment yesterday.

In a statement released in April, Kith Meng said that the project “will contribute greatly to the continued economic development of Cambodia, ensuring a reliable, moderately-priced supply of electricity”.